I’m starting to wonder if Angus is actually Maleficent’s son since he mentioned that his mother was a sorceress. Morgana apparently called Maleficent Elaine and Elaine happens to be the name of Lancelot, Argus’ actual name’s mother.
Good catch. Many of us assumed that Maleficent was Morgause but this seems even more likely now. I think the Camelot chapter (whenever that ends up being released) will explain a great deal of mysteries.
White Phoenix
2 years ago
So many of us speculated that Argus was connected to Maleficent (the popular theory being he looked like her son or male incarnation) so not surprised Aurora sees him and assumes he’s working for Maleficent.
Disneyprince14
2 years ago
interesting if not a strange change/retcon. She was never that good with a sword.
That concept of using skills that were not her own through the sword was already present in the first version; it just hadn’t been shown yet. This scene already existed in my plans, but it was modified at the last minute in the first version, so I’m recovering it now 🙂
NOW the ‘Rage Princess’ nickname makes sense!
Kronk: “Oh Yeah…it’s all coming together.”
I’m starting to wonder if Angus is actually Maleficent’s son since he mentioned that his mother was a sorceress. Morgana apparently called Maleficent Elaine and Elaine happens to be the name of Lancelot, Argus’ actual name’s mother.
Good catch. Many of us assumed that Maleficent was Morgause but this seems even more likely now. I think the Camelot chapter (whenever that ends up being released) will explain a great deal of mysteries.
So many of us speculated that Argus was connected to Maleficent (the popular theory being he looked like her son or male incarnation) so not surprised Aurora sees him and assumes he’s working for Maleficent.
interesting if not a strange change/retcon. She was never that good with a sword.
That concept of using skills that were not her own through the sword was already present in the first version; it just hadn’t been shown yet. This scene already existed in my plans, but it was modified at the last minute in the first version, so I’m recovering it now 🙂
oh.sorry. not criticising. not trying too at least. Dearest apologies.
It’s fine I was just explaining:)