In the first version, I think Argus more or less gloated about the fact that his lover was a married queen. Here he doesn’t indicate that part, just that they’re not married to each other.
yes, I remember that now as well! That makes even more sense if we are assuming that Argus is Maleficent’s son since she would be a contemporary of Guinevere.
In the first version, I think Argus more or less gloated about the fact that his lover was a married queen. Here he doesn’t indicate that part, just that they’re not married to each other.
He also mentioned that she was much older than him!
yes, I remember that now as well! That makes even more sense if we are assuming that Argus is Maleficent’s son since she would be a contemporary of Guinevere.